Saraki In
The Eyes Of Buhari’s Group
By
Buhari Media Organisation
No
amount of political brinksmanship by Senate President Bukola Saraki can water
down the damning verdict delivered by the people of Kwara State on his
four-year stint as head of the legislative arm of government.
According
to the Buhari Media Organisation (BMO), this is clearer than any skewed
self-appraisal Saraki may want to do to present himsel as “one of the best
Senate Presidents in the nation’s political history” and, in the process, paint
the Executive in bad light.
BMO
said in a statement signed by its Chairman Niyi Akinsiju and Secretary Cassidy
Madueke, that what Saraki got at the polls was instant judgement for his treachery
to the All Progressives Congress (APC) throughout his tenure as Chairman of the
National Assembly.
“We
agree with the APC’s National Leader Asiwaju Bola Tinubu that the outgoing
National Assembly leadership was antagonistic to President Muhammadu Buhari for
the better part of its tenure.
“His
predecessor David Mark was in that office for eight years and hardly was there
a time he was openly confrontational against the late President Umaru YarAdua
or former President Goodluck Jonathan of the same political party, except when
he accused the Jonathan administration of shielding the former Pension Reform Task
Team leader Abdulrasheed Maina from prosecution and issued an ultimatum to the
then President to break all links with the controversial civil servant.
“Not
surprising, Benue State people rewarded Mark with what looked like an
indefinite Senate tenure in recognition of his contribution to an excellent
Executive-Legislature relations, until he opted against a return to the upper
chamber.
“This
cannot be compared to the blatant rejection of Saraki and every single one of
his minions who stood for different elective positions only a few weeks ago in
a state that he had an almost total control of for about 16 years.
“If
this is not a just reward delivered by his immediate constituents for his
antagonistic and self-centred leadership of the Senate, we don’t know what it
is, especially as even a neophyte knows that all politics is local,” it said.
The
group noted that Saraki’s response to Tinubu’s position showed that indeed the
Senate under him was bent on imposing a ‘noxious, reactionary and
self-interested legislation on the nation.’
BMO
said: “In an apparent bid to paint the Executive bad, Saraki, through his media
aide, had argued that President Buhari sent only 11 bills to the National
Assembly in four years.
“But
he also shot himself in the foot, nay,7 feet, by admitting that only two of the
bills had been passed as at April 22! Two Executive bills passed in almost 4
years while more than 200 private members bills were passed within the same
period!
“At
least 26 bills passed by the Senate were of course rejected by the President
for several reasons. These include the Peace Corps Bill which several senators
including the leadership were believed to have backed for selfish reasons.
“We
also know that the President initially rejected the Electoral Act (amendment
bill) because the lawmakers left out the Smart Card Reader, aside from the very
many errors and the ‘landmines’, including electronic transmission of results
so close to election date”.
BMO
added that all these happened because the National Assembly in general and the
Senate in particular did not have the benefit of a self-less leadership.
“Aside
from indulging in subterfuge, the Senate had the misfortune of having a
President who would readily abandon his duty post or shut down the upper
chamber at his whims and caprices.
“At
other times, he would prefer to play the role of a bagman to a failed
Presidential candidate as they gallivant around the world cooking up what is
now famously known as the Dubai strategy which ultimately collapsed and cost
him his only claim to fame.
“So
there was really no time for the Senate President to concentrate on the job, to
the extent that under his watch, National Assembly staff shut down the
Legislative complex on more than one occasion, and also threatened to prevent
the presentation of the 2019 budget in December last year if their demands were
not met.
“And
when it was time for what turned out to be a referendum on the tenure of Saraki
and his co-travellers in the Senate, the ever-discerning Nigerian voting public
ensured that only one out of the multitude of senators who joined him to move
to the PDP was re-elected”.
what are your views , please drop your opinion on comment side .
Disclaimer:
Comments
expressed here do not reflect the opinion of samolusanjos.blogspot.com
Kindly Share This Story
No comments:
Post a Comment